Whether the Burgess land use model is still relevant in the modern day

Urban land use models ar knowing to help us understand how townspeoplesfolks develop. Although towns and cities have no exact match, the models are intentional to represent that every urban area has its similarities. Since models rarely take into account things care hills and rivers, on that point are no guarantees that the model ordain be all told accurate. I am using the Burgess model because it was one of the about successful land use models- it may well be similarly successful in the modern town.A man called E.W Burgess designed an Urban Land use model, naming it after himself. It was designed in his home country of America, in the city of Chicago. This is what he designedBurgess possible action was that peck competed for limited amounts of space. Only people who that the governs were arranged concentrically, polar in age and character. Burgess believed that the housing became newer, and the residents became wealthier, the further they got from the CBD. The people who could reach the exceed land got it, people like businessmen. The poorest groups were left with the worst locations. Burgess believed that antithetic zones of the city had different functions.These are the sections of the city that he identified* important business district contains the major shops and offices, and is the centre for commerce, entertainment and carry-over.* Wholesale escape industry- This is where the oldest housing in the city is. Such housing is usually deteriorating into pass property. Some areas are in any case being taken over by light industry. The locals tend to be immigrants or poorer social groups.* Low elucidate residential- Inhabited by people who have managed to escape from the previous zone. They engage in nearby factories, and have no choice but to get it on on that point so they can get to work quickly and cheaply.* median(a) class residential- The housing is of a better part, and is just aboutly semi separated and council estates. * High class residential- Occupied by people who can afford the most expensive properties and the high cost of properties, and the high cost of commuting. This zone likewise includes the commuter villages beyond the edge of the city, although there were few in Burgess time.The Burgess model is also linked to the bid-rent model. The amount of money different land users are pull up stakesing to pay for the land depends on their location- the CBD has the most expensive rents. It is the most accessible area as most transport services are focused on the city centre, and main roadstead meet here. The more accessible a location, then the easier it is to get there. Therefore, people prefer to have work locations that people can access easily, and are also prepared to pay more for them.The Burgess Model also ignores the fact that nearly all towns are affected by bodily features such as rivers, lakes and hills. It also ignores heavy industries, and housing redevelopment. Also, in 1924, the re was not so much dependence on transport as there is today.Other weaknesses in the model include the criticism that in public, zones do not just end, and the next one begins. Zones overflow, and the model is designed for highly developed cities such as Chicago, and not 3rd humanity cities that you might find in Ethiopia and Sudan. Therefore, the model is not universally correct. shot 1.Land use changes with increasing distance from the centre of Blaydon.This statement fits in with the Burgess model, as Burgess claimed that the land near the CBD ordain be densely populated and tightly fitted, whilst the land further out of town will have more room for things like gardens. Houses will be terraced near the town centre, and semi detatched on the outskirts. This statement fits in with Burgess fight Rent Model, as he claimed that land in the centre of the town was more useful and therefore expensive, so less people would be able to afford big gardens.This surmise should be true, be cause in reality most towns grow from the centre, and will therefore have many buildings squeeze into a small section of land near the middle, but towards the countryside there is more free space guess 2.Housing age will get going younger with increasing distance from the centre of Blaydon.This theory fits into the burgess model because the further you are from the city centre the younger the houses will be because the growth of cities are from the CBD so the houses on the outskirts will be the youngest. The CBD was built first in the beginning of the development of Blaydon. This involves that houses will be built after the early developments. This process will keep up until there is no land to build on. This theory means that houses will be younger as you progress further skeletal system the CBD.The supposal should be true because the Burgess model claims city growth occurred in the CBD first then grew outwards form there.Hypothesis 3The theatrical role of life will improve with increasing distance from the CBD of Blaydon.This theory also fits into the burgess model because as you get further away from the CBD the environment qualities should enlarge and also better housing materials will be available. Hypothesis 2 links with this hypothesis because as the houses become younger, they will become more modern and better building methods will be being used. Quality of life will increase due to the steady increase of size in houses as you progress further from the CBD. Bigger houses mean more money and better quality of life. For example, big gardens and garages accompanied with driveways. In my view this is a better quality of life compared to terraced houses with no gardens.This hypothesis should be true because the house age will decrease and quality of life will increase as you move further form the CBD. Also the environment wont be as bad because the roads and personal credit line will be less congested.