Pros And Cons Of Judicial Review :: Government Judicial Review Essays

Pros and Cons of Judicial reviewJudicial Review is the male monarch given to peremptory court justices in which a render has the power to reason whether a law is unconstitutional or not. top dogJustice John Marshall initiated the dictatorial Courts right to translate the ecesis in 1803 following the case of Marbury Vs. Madison, in which hedeclared the Supreme Court as the sole interpreters of Constitutional law. Thisis one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the unite States. ManyHistorical thinkers would find some problem in imagining a political sympathies set upto limit the power of itself,but others would argue that this form of governmentbest works for the people, and not against them. The word of theConstitution by the Supreme Court as a invigoration document that is able to betranslated variantly over time for the hot of the people has as many skepticsas it does supporters. But, if we do not acknowledge the Supreme Court to translatethe Constitution who then, should the people chose to do such an important job.If we were to look back at the ideas and thoughts of some of thegreatest political thinkers of our time, we would find that individuals such asPlato, Niccolo Machiavelli, and John Locke, would share extremely differentviews as to whether or not Judicial review, and the Supreme Court as a whole,would be successful in their ideal government situations. peerless of the earliest political philosophers Plato, would find ourpresent day governmental frame-up of the Supreme Court to be the ideal group todeal with the United States situation. Plato felt that government should be runby enlightened philosopher kings, that would reign over for the good of the people,and not themselves. We today see the Supreme Court as a collection of the mostenlightened thinkers of our day. They are chosen to posit moral decisions aboutlaws made by others in our society, and decide whether or not the laws we makeare in the best interest of our landed estate as a whole. Plato knew that within anypolitical State their would be corruption, to stop the corruption Plato feltthat the philosopher kings would best rule because they would not bumblethemselves in a corrupt society. They only believed in the truth, and justicethat government is supposed to protect its people with.Although Plato would not totally agree with the republican structure ofour government, I believe that he would chose for our society, a state that isgovern by a similar group to that of our Supreme Court because, the members of