Friday, March 22, 2019

Euthanasia Essay: Moral Considerations in the Debate :: Euthanasia Physician Assisted Suicide

example Considerations in the Euthanasia Debate The Judeo- rescuerian moral tradition celebrates spiritedness as the gift of a loving God, and respects the life-time of individually human being because each is made in the image and alikeness of God. As Christians we also believe we argon redeemed by Christ and called to share eternal life with Him. Our Church views life as a sacred trust, a gift over which we are given stewardship and non absolute dominion. The Church thus opposes all direct attacks on bare life. As conscientious stewards we have a duty to preserve life, plot of ground recognizing certain limits to that duty Because human life is the foundation for all different human goods, it has a special value and significance. Life is the first beneficial of the human person and the condition of all the early(a)s.1 All crimes against life, including euthanasia or willful suicide, must be opposed.2 Euthanasia is an action or an inadvertence which of itself or b y intention causes death, in order that all injury whitethorn in this way be eliminated. Its terms of reference are to be found in the intention of the will and in the methods used.3 frankincense defined, euthanasia is an attack on life which no virtuoso has a right to make or request, and which no government or early(a) human authority can legitimately recommend or permit. Although individual guilt may be reduced or absent because of pain or emotional factors that cloud the conscience, this does not change the objective wronglyfulness of the act. It should also be recognized that an apparent plea for death may really be a plea for help and love. Suffering is a fact of human life, and has special significance for the Christian as an fortune to share in Christs redemptive suffering. Nevertheless there is nothing wrong in trying to relieve someones suffering in fact it is a positive good to do so, as long as one does not intentionally cause death or interfere with other moral and religious duties.4 Everyone has the duty to care for his or her own life and health and to seek necessary medical care from others, but this does not mean that all possible remedies must be used in all circumstances. One is not obliged to use either sinful means or disproportionate means of preserving life -- that is, means which are understood as offering no reasonable hope of returns or as involving excessive burdens.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.