How did the Tsar deal with unrest Essay Example

How did the Tsar deal with unrest Essay Example How did the Tsar deal with unrest Essay How did the Tsar deal with unrest Essay How did the Tsar deal with unrest during 1905? Throughout 1905 there were many Instances of unrest that the Tsar dealt with well In the sense that to a certain extent it was controlled. There were however many cases that the Tsar didnt deal with well or In fact, deal with at all. Nicholas failures during this period of revolution began with the Russians loss in the Russo-Japanese (lasting from 1904 1905) war. Russians defeat was hugely humiliating for the nation and many turned to blame the Tsar. It was the beginning f the exposure of Russians incompetent military and bureaucracy. This humiliating loss was almost a catalyst to the revolution, but this in mind, the immediate cause of the was the event of Bloody Sunday a peaceful march aiming to bring a petition to the Tsar resulting in the supposed deaths of around 1,000 people killed by the Cossack troops In a source It said The soldiers fired all day long. The dead were counted In the hundreds, the wounded In the thousands. 1 This source however Is probably Inaccurate seeing as Trotsky wasnt actually present In SST Petersburg at the mime. Bloody Sunday was a huge turning point In the relationship between the Tsar and his people Bloody Sunday put an end to the myth of the Tsar-Bathtubs The loving father from whom nothing good could come. 2 There is no apparent reason for this source not to be trusted, even though it was published 86 years after the events, it complies with the majority of sources (excluding sources that may appear biased) from the time. Bloody Sunday was the final act that broke that shattered the illusion that the Tsar was appointed as the leader by God as Marc Offer said in the name piece Bloody Sunday snapped the sacred bond which had united people with their Tsar3. Eventually the people began to revolt, there were acts of terrorism and strikes spreading rapidly all over Russia. In June there was mutiny aboard the battleship Pottering, creating disturbances wealth the government as they were concerned that other sections of the armed forces would also mutiny. The government decided something had to be done about this, If Nicholas lost the support of his military he would lose his most powerful tool in controlling the people, o to resolve the situation, in September a peace treaty was signed between the Russians and the Japanese, there were thousands of troops now available to end the disruption within Russia itself. In order to get back in favor with the military the government paid them all their pay back and promised them all better conditions in order to regain their loyalty. This was one of the better decisions made by the Tsar in controlling the unrest, as was peaceful and he didnt have to resort to force. In the countryside the peasant rioting were spreading more and more,offences would angel from simple acts of Insubordination and refusing to pay tax, to looting and burning the landowners houses and selling land and livestock, It is Important to realism that peasants made up for 80% of the population and not very much was little power. Different groups were also demanding changes, and strikes were happening all over the country; a source stated work stopped everywhere: on the railways, in all factories, workshops 4 The relationship between Russia and France was fairly stable at the time so there appears to be no reason for the French Consul o exaggerate or falsify the information. While these strikes were going on in SST. Petersburg a workers Soviet was formed where factory representatives would meet to organize strikes. Similar Soviets began to form in other cities, this was a great threat to the Tsars government. To deal with the forming of the Soviets and the strikes, the Tsar was left with two main options, deal with force ( possibly his preferred option, but would create an even bigger barrier between him and the people and was incredibly inhumane due to the amount of people that would have to e killed ) and giving in. So on October the 30th Nicholas very reluctantly issued the October manifesto, in order to provide reforms like the establishment of Dumb and liberal freedom, this worked possibly better than even the Tsar himself expected splitting the opposition as he had managed to please the liberals and middle class people with a supposedly democratic government that they had been fighting for ending their protests and turning their support to the Tsarist government. Although Nicholas concessions were actually limited, the laws were changed to voting laws to reverent the election of radicals and the secret police did actually carry on destroying the opposition. A newspaper in 1905 wrote Weve been given a constitution yet the autocracy remains5 This source however is possibly inaccurate and exaggerated at the time even if it was proven to be true later on, the constitution had barely been around when the source was posted and it was a newspaper that belonged to the Soviet who was formed to overthrow the government. In December, all the troops had returned back to Russia and the Tsar felt as though e had regained his power, and regained his control, he was now ready to face the opposition ( the SST Petersburg Soviet and an armed uprising taking place in Moscow). Although this would have made him unpopular, in terms of control however, it did work. This may have worked in the short- term but as a long term solution it Just drove a bigger divide between the Tsar and his people. The Tsar with the exception of Bloody Sunday- did actually managed to deal with the situation in the most peaceful way possible ( The gnaws mutiny and the reluctant gigging of the manifesto) with least bloodshed even if he was forced to do so. The October Manifesto may have ended up being a long list of broken promises and he may have never have had good intentions he did please a large proportion of his people momentarily. Although the way he dealt with opposition wasnt the most peaceful or humane method of dealing with the situation, ultimately it was dealt with, and it was dealt with quickly. So in terms of the question the Tsar dealt with unrest well, and within the year managed to regain almost complete control again.