Lebanon War 2006 Essay

The Lebanon state of fight of 2006 began on July 12th, when Hezbollah launched a rocket attack on Israeli military positions stationed near the draw up between Lebanon and Israel. In the minutes during the prove chaos, Hezbollah militants crossed the border into Israel, and kidnapped two Israeli soldiers who they intended to handling as collateral in a prisoner exchange with Israel. The state of war lasted until August 13, 2006, at which point the United Nations intervened.During the war, both sides targeted politeian areas, resulting in the deaths of all over one thousand noncombatants and the displacement of thousands more. In an broadsheet of the 2006 Lebanese War published by the Anti-Defamation League, Hezbollah militants are accused of launch rockets into Israel with the intention of harming civilians. Conversely, it is explained that the Israeli military targeted Lebanese civilian areas because Hezbollah has been cognize to operate out and live amongst civilian hom es and stores.In addition, it appears that the author of the account places the blame upon Hezbollah for igniting the war against Israel by launching rockets across the border in the years following the departure of Israeli forces from Lebanon, after the Lebanese Civil War and the Israeli besieging on capital of Lebanon. The ADL reports that there were over twenty occurrences of attacks launched by Hezbollah militants on Israel between 2000 and 2006. The ADL, however, does not bring to an end its account of the events without covering errors made by Israel.Many Israelis allegedly held their own presidential term accountable for the destruction of parts of the country, not because the government retaliated against Hezbollahs attack, but because the military and country had been ill-prepared for the conflict and its soldiers ill-equipped (ADL). Such accusations prompted the Israeli Prime Minister to order a commission of inquiry to address the accusations. In 2007 and 2008, the Wi nograd Commission announced that questionable decision making had interpreted place during the war by Israeli government officials.Rasha Saltis private account of the 2006 war from the perspective of a citizen living in Beirut makes no mention of Israels self-proclaimed guilt, however. Her compilation of notes written during the war kinda portray the violent attacks and practical demolition of Lebanon a country that had exclusively recently managed to rebuild itself after the conclusion of the fifteen year civil war in 1990. Her frustration about the situation and her devastating accounts of civilian casualties during the 2006 war blame only the Israeli military and government because of the ferine force and destruction used against Lebanon.Salti even makes reference to the abduction of the Israeli soldiers, and criticizes the Israeli government for overreacting and launching a war against Lebanon in retaliation. The ADLs verbal description provides factual data that is not inc luded in Saltis siege notes, and alternately the siege notes provide a personal account of the war that any reader would be able to relate to and identify with. disdain reporting upon Israels Winograd Commission, the ADL seducely maintains the perspective that Hezbollah functions as a terrorist organization and was at fault for the 2006 Lebanon War.Salti, on the other hand, conveys a clear message about Israels vicious military and menacing government. The comparability of documents such as the ADL and Salti accounts of the 2006 Lebanon War illuminates the importance of collecting multiple sources of data before drawing conclusions about any historical event.Referenceshttp//www.mepc.org/http//www.google.com