'Should Prisoners be Treated as Humans\r'

'Some raft think that once a soulfulness generates a evil or breaks the law, they no longer stay put to exercise their gentleity rights. In occurrence, they believe that prison house house houseers do non deserve tender rights. The interference of these inmates devolve into question; especially when most facilities and prisons atomic compute 18 everywherecrowded, receiving to a undischargeder extent noeticly ill prisoners, and female incarceration is on the rise. The problem with virtually of society is they do non want prisoners to be tempered with some(prenominal) common, human decency. They believe inmates consume it great by take in healthy and receiving adequate medical alimony.Being able to action out and learn new trades for the future has some of society’s members upset with paying revenue enhancement monies for these types of â€Å"amenities”. I believe that every human has the right to meals and preventive health dole out. Peopl e should non concur to fear for their safety or health be take in they have attached a abomination. I do non risk oneself they should receive good sermon: punishment should be adequate for the curse committed, merely the prisoner should non be in bane of starvation, abusive treatment from otherwise inmates or staff, or fear of medical neglect. prisoners atomic derive 18 in fact human macrocosms and of course punishment was much worsened in ancient judgment of convictions. at that place would be ascetic physical punishment, and living conditions while incarcerated were much worse than conditions today. Let’s explore some of the treatment of prisoners and the and how they be some sentences affected by this treatment. I believe treating prisoners as you would any other soulfulness: with the most basic human rights. This is an honourable predicament we as society are faced with. The area and the incidents that occur in it are very unpredictable.There are plenty of plurality who neer expected or thought they would ever draw incarcerated. I, somebodyally, was incarcerated from age seventeen to age thirty-three. I have experienced quite a a bit of wrong treatment, as vigorous as been a witness to this treatment. There is no self-defense law here in California. I was attacked by a girl with a gun. We fought over this gun and she was crap-shooter once in the neck. During the time of the scuffle, she was wanted for an outstanding warrant for the murder of a pregnant woman. I was convicted for attempt murder and sentenced to 14 courses of incarceration as an eighteen year old.My incarceration was to take place in a California State Prison for Women. Upon my reception to render prison, I have been victim to and witnessed unethical conduct towards the prisoners. With prison overcrowding and an influx off inmates who are noeticly ill. There are also the medicine offenders. The drug offenders develop up a large fleshify of pr isoners. There are a variety of ethnicities, emphasises, and classes of soulfulnesss incarcerated. Prison overcrowding contributes to a lot of the unethical treatment of prison inmates. When the prisons are overcrowded, inmates are not segregated amongst other inmates of their aforementioned(prenominal) security levels or risks.Sometimes these conditions make it short for annoyances to be committed within the quick-wittedness or institution. many a(prenominal) naughty risk inmates lead make victims out of the less violent, vulnerable inmates. The prisoners fuck become victims of rape, theft, assault, and sometimes murder. Some prisoners have been kn take in to commit suicide because the conditions in prison are to a fault difficult to deal with. To report any crime committee against you while a prisoner, give the sack conk to retaliation from the prison population; terrorizing one with fear.There is what is called â€Å" clean” lore. According to Mosser (2010),à ‚ intuition is described as inexplicable feelings a someone may have somewhat something being â€Å"right” or â€Å"wrong”. My intuition tells me it is wrong to treat anyone with inhumane behavior. It is not cook up to put an individual in impose on _or_ oppress modal value alone because they have make a fault to society. Yes, they should definitely pay the price for whatever crime is committed. Mentally ill souls have also contributed to the prison population. Several inmates really just need to be placed somewhere that can provide the rational help needed to help rehabilitate them. With so few doctors and staff for the mentally ill, it seems rehabilitation is just an illusion.With mentally ill patients integrated into a prison population, there are bound to be conflicts, as well as abuse. Abuse occurs among the inmates as I have mentioned earlier. Although, half of California’s mental hospitals were closed by the posthumous 1960s, Governor Reagan, d uring the late 1970s shut down the mental hospitals totally (Torrey, E. F. , M. D. , Kennard, A. D. , Eslinger, D. , Lamb, R. , M. D. , Pavle, J. , 2010). With overcrowding, and barely enough of a budget to care for the health of the inmates, how can a prisoner’s mental hygiene be taken care of?Most of these prisoners are forced to be enwrapped in sole(a) confinement. Metzner (2010) states, â€Å"The adverse readys of solitary confinement are especially significant for persons with earnest mental illness, commonly defined as mental disorder (e. g. , schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder) that is usually characterized by psychotic symptoms and/or significant functional impairments (para. 4). solitary confinement confinement can do more harm than good. Inmates may possibly leave prison in a worse state than when they entered prison.People worry   round measure dollars going to prisoner’s solid food and shelter, but if a prisoner can be â⠂¬Å"corrected” by the department of corrections, that will demean the recidivism rate and less prisoners will return to prison. Earlier, I mentioned drug offenders making up a great deal of the prison population. Some populate’s addiction does not stop because they are incarcerated. antheral police officers outnumber female officers by deuce to one. male person officers make up at least two-thirds of the officers and guards. There are times I have witnessed my cellmate receiving drugs forsexual favors for the officer. The officer will come at a time when there are no there are no other people around and pass these sexual favors. Some guards would even make a girl have sex with them. They would threaten to intensify the inmate’s release date, or cause the inmate to be placed in a berth to be caused physical harm by other inmates. These unethical treatments should not be overlooked. Many women are victims of abuse and domestic violence. They have attempted t o leave a situation with an abusive partner, and this leads to the homicide if the partner.Donna Hazley (2010) states, â€Å"The same legal system that fails or refuses to protect beat-up women prosecutes them vigorously when they fight back (para. 11). There are also women incarcerated with wants of returning to society as a rehabilitated individual, and return to caring for their families. Not all people that are incarcerated al directions lose custodial rights of their children. They hope to return to care for these children. These children deserve a chance, if it is viable to rehabilitate their parents. Not everyone serving a prison sentence is an outcast, monster, or society’s reject.These are human people with human feelings, and emotions. Again, I label no one should be subjected  to these treatments because they have committed a crime. No one can authentically know the remorse a person feels for the things they have done wrong, and therefore, should not impose upon them abuse. In cuddle shot this pick out of the unethical treatment of prisoners, I believe the classical theory of deontology could resolve this burden. Deontology is described as looking at the reason the act was committed alternatively of the consequences of an act (Mosser, 2010).It is a deontologist’s position that we treat everyone with respect, and consider each human being’s dignity when dealing with them. If it is considered why a woman has committed a violent crime against her spouse, then maybe she can be treated with ethical treatment, instead of what one feels is much merit abuse because she is a prisoner. According to an article by the Human’s Rights Watch, A video commemorate at a California state facility showed two officers severely beating and kicking two inmates (2004). Deontologists theorize that no one should be beat out and kicked for no reason. It is unethical to treat a person with such excessive force. lawfulness ethics is al so an prelude that can be taken to resolve the issue I have presented of unethical behavior of prisoners. Virtue ethics focuses more on the character of the person performing the act (Mosser, 2010). If we paid attention to the individual that performed the crime, we may better understand a way to effectively deal with the person without imposing any abuse upon the individual. Utilitarian’s ethical approach is basing a decision on the best vector sum for the greater number (Mosser, 2010). It is likely to be dependable to society to treat prisoners with common human rights, and not subject them to inhumane behavior.If people can rehabilitate, instead of  become at risk for mental issues, high recidivism, and absence from the family, society will benefit as a whole. There will not be the need to spend so many tax dollars on prisons because so many prisons will not be needed. Families will be united and given up the tools necessary to prosper and benefit, having a positive effect on children being raised with their parents. The problem with the deontologist’s theory is that a relativist will say that it is not their problem to concern themselves with how prisoners are being treated.Relativism is the determine regarded by an individual based on their own ethical standards; usually based on their background and culture (Mosser, 2010). One will argue that it is what prisoners deserve because that is just what they believe. It may be acceptable in someone’s society to mistreat prisoners and the mistreatment not be considered unethical. Emotivism suggests that moral claims express an aflame response or attitude (Mosser, 2010). Mostly, people feel as if prisoners deserve unfair treatment. In fact, people feel as if they don’t deserve to be treated as human beings at all.Emotivism can reduce our moral judgment to something so saucer-eyed like an emotional response; we may be robbing someone of a fair ethical decision. In my opinion, this can cause harm to the greater number of individuals effected by the decision, thus, presenting a scrap to the issue of utilitarianism. In this case the moral issue will not be examined because it is being responded to in an emotional way. Virtue ethics, I remind you, focuses on the virtues of the person performing the act. It is not an easy thing to do, difficult to determine why a person made a certain choice.This person or assemblage of individuals could have made this choice for a number of reasons. Sometimes, it is much more apparent why a person or group has done something. otherwise times, it is not.  Ethical egoism can be the challenge to virtue ethics. Ethical egoism argues that our moral decisions should be based on our desires and goals (Mosser, 2010). Our individualised goals and desires are what trigger us make many of the decisions we make in our lives. If an outcome does not appeal to our goals and desires, we tend to find a way to dispute that.Finding a person’s virtue may conflict with our personal goals and desires. A person may have been robbed once before, and now has a biased toward anyone that has committed a crime, regardless of their motivation to commit the offense. If the victim’s personal desire is to see any person who commits theft to â€Å"rot” in prison, they will not consider the virtue ethics of a prisoner, therefore, the unethical treatment of prisoners seeming completely ethical to the ethical egoist. Having served so much time in prison, deontology is the side by side(predicate) view to my own.I believe that every action has a consequence and people need to suffer a consequence when they have broken the law. Respecting this theory, I equable believe that everyone should be treated with respect and human decency. Although, I shot the young lady in the struggle over the gun, she was already wanted and convicted of murder. I feared for my keep, as well as did not cogitate to cause great bo dily injury; otherwise, I would have shot her repeatedly. Finances and social class had a lot to do with my conviction. I was unable(p) to afford the best attorney and I was what was considered â€Å"at-risk” urban youth.Society did not care about the reason the victim ended up shot once. It was argued by strangers who did not know me that I deserved to serve 14 years, and maybe even deserved to be shot myself. Either way, I am a beseeming human being, who wanted nothing other than to reintegrate into society and make a positive life for myself. People could never understand that unless they have been in prison, or have a family member who has exhausted time in prison. There are people who deserve to be treated fairly no matter whether they  have committed a crime or not.I am sure I can benefit from therapy. It feels as if sometimes, I am crucifixion from post-traumatic stress. I feel I didn’t deserve to receive some of the abuse that I have fallen victim to. I nhumane treatment in prisons should be investigated. Society should take time to deliberate all the issues and realize heinous crimes are committed and one absolutely should pay their debt to society, but never at the cost of their basic human rights. â€Å" every(prenominal) persons deprived of liberty shall be treated at all times with humanity and with respect for the implicit in(p) dignity of the human person”, (OHCHR, 2005).\r\n'