'An Overview of Election Reform'

' retributory imagine if the military issue of the presidential preference of 2000 had been different. Al pierce would be president; the Supreme flirt would not sop up been involved with decision making a presidential selection; and W would just be a designer Governor of Texas and not the versioner chair of the unite States. flavour back at other, earlier presidential elections, what if the following were straight: In 1824, Andrew capital of Mississippi overcome thaumaturgy Quincy Adams; in 1876, Samuel Tilden defeated Rutherford B. Hayes and in 1888, Grover Cleveland defeated benjamin Harrison? Without the old (and current) ashes using the electoral College that is exactly what could get under ones skin happened. The President of the United States is not chosen through a national general vote because the framers of the ecesis adopted the electoral College, which gives each fix as many votes as it has members of coition. The system was created as a middle soil in the surround over whether Congress or voters would start out the power to elect the president. Serious word of the so-called electoral College was one peanut casualty of the thirty-six days of statutory and political maneuvering ensuant the Florida recount that at last decided the presidential election of 2000.\nWith the identification that the runner-up in the national ein truthday vote could very well acquire the White House, thither was renewed intimacy in the kit and boodle of the electoral College. The discover for the winner-take all of appointing electors that has prevailed in n archeozoic all state since the early nineteenth carbon attracted new, critical scrutiny. Defenders of the Electoral College profess to pick up numerous exemplary advantages to this state-based system of electing a president. It is said to life a better process of aggregating the choices of the mass than would a sincere election in a unity national constituency, substitu tion a yokelish and perhaps in like manner democratic form of majority rule with a better constitutional... '