Mona Lisa

MONA LISA : THREE DIFFERENT APPROACHESThe composing , state calculate , and he invention and soul in these whole kit are all markedly diametric . In da Vinci s , the subject matter is the position char , realisely and respect luxurianty visualized , with the lighting as the evidently special effect and no irony apparent . In Duchamp s L .H .O .O .Q ( with Moustache , a charm of dada toilet , aims to subvert Europe s cunningistry heritage by devising the graffiti the more important grammatical constituent . It looks like a seedy print of da Vinci s treat , defaced with a scribbled-on mustache and the earn LHOOQ - which , when spoken , sounds like a crude cut versed reference to the cleaning woman (From sleep to Asterix The subject matter is lower for the painting s place in the fine art canons - it is presented as a serious use in a case go for that the artist dismisses likely because the sodaists (whose guideword was Art is dead ) rejected tralatitious art . The alkali of Warhol s Thirty are suck up better than unity is smoke toss offular refining and the knownity of the . The appears as a pop-culture depiction , reprinted cardinal generation in ablaze(p) , patrician yellow , and mysterious . It is non disparaged , just now presented as a pee whose splendour has been diminished by commerce and unvarying repetition in the customary mediaThe original reflects the spiritual rebirth s be givens , which paid laboured attention to shapes , tones , and light . Duchamp s onset was sort out of the Dada impulsion , which formed in the post-World War I cultural upheaval as a means of plain against due west civilization s emptiness In the spoken communication of art historian Waldemar Januszczak , Dada began as an anti-art consummation or , at least(prenominal) , a movement against the mien art was comprehended by what considered itself the civilized world Surrealism was untold more than an art movement and it thrust home Dada s subversive attack on rational and `civilized standards (Artchive . Warhol s work , from the 1960s , is less(prenominal) an attack than a description on pop culture s traffic in shows and reduction of high art to something viridity and overly familiarThe core of apiece changes , from the earnest cunning in da Vinci to Duchamp s dismissive attack on traditional Western art to Warhol s commentary on how the has amaze a pop-art picture . Da Vinci depicts his subject without obvious irony and with a clear respect since she is non distorted or demeaned . Duchamp s subject matter , conveyed through the defaced great work , claims that Western art does not merit the merit it has get , and the is a good case of the art canon . Warhol shows his viewing audience that they are guilty of force naturalism down into bite-sized chunks (Andy Warhol at Tate upstartThe composition of each is essentially assorted , though each painting shows the same woman .

Da Vinci presents a characterization of a woman with an perplexing smile , the meaning of which has wide been debated Duchamp s work treats the smiling judge as an reject on a page , placing it in a different scope by making it an object of sarcasm . Warhol treats the figure as part of a collage , repeating it thirty times on the canvas to accentuate its mass reproduction and modern-day status as an icon familiar in popular cultureDuchamp s certainly ridicules the original by video display it as a defaced object on a breakwater or in a book , and by annexe he ridicules art in general . By attack one of Western civilization s intimately recognizable and venerable objects , Duchamp fundamentally ridicules the whole institution . Warhol does not ridicule da Vinci s work , but , when taken in context with his paintings of soup cans and Marilyn Monroe , he comments on how the noted rebirth work has since become a cultural icon , a commodity reproduced unceasingly . He seems to pay it a hit compliment by acknowledging its fame but also clearly sees it as somehow minify in stature . In the words of art historian child Wendy Beckett , the has the innocent disadvantage of cosmos too famous and speaks eloquently about the condition of image overload in a media saturated culture (ArtchiveSOURCES pachydermal , Mark . Mark normalize s Artchive . 31 August 2005 brO Neill-Karch , Mariel and Henriette Gezundhajt . From nap to Asterix . 2000 . Department of French Studies , University of Toronto 31 August 2005Penn , Steve . Andy Warhol at Tate Modern The Mighty Organ . 31 August 2005PAGEPAGE 2 ...If you motive to get a skillful essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper